Hortus Conclusus

More Light:

How a word came to be devalued

If it were at all possible for the people of the western world as a whole to rid themselves of the many kinds of narcotics which deprive them of every lasting and lucid self-contemplation, a shudder of terror would take hold of them when recognising the awful darkness enveloping them with respect to spiritual knowledge.

 Although in this hemisphere ‘Christendom’ allegedly prevails and its adherents base themselves upon the writings of the four authors known as the ‘Evangelists’, the bringers of ‘glad tidings’ and of the light to lighten the ‘gentiles’…

 Yet the writers of these ‘Gospels’ have their exalted master speak thus to his disciples:

“Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven: but to the others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand!”

 It is a hard and dreadful saying if all people – as one likes to think – were ‘equal before God’, if ‘the others’ accordingly had somehow a right to get to the bottom of the ‘mysteries of the kingdom of God’ in the same way?! –

 Yet the holy books upon which all Christian teaching is built know nothing of this ‘equality before God’. – They clearly and incisively differentiate between the ‘children of this world’ and the ‘children of the light’.

 They have their master warn of throwing what is ‘holy to the dogs’ and casting ‘pearls before swine’… similes which are explicit enough not to be caught up in the view that all men are ‘equal before God’!

 The ancient records of his life and death have him keep silent about Pilate’s question: who he was; yet to those who had recognised the things ‘flesh and blood could not reveal’ he gives in his sovereignty confirmation and says to them:

 “You call me Master, and you say well, for so I am!”

Yet where in the four texts called the ‘Gospels’ can we find those words which this master spoke only to his confidants, to those chosen by him??

 It is true, words can be found which can be traced back to a teaching known only to the disciples, yet one will search in vain for the teaching itself.

 The Church of Rome is certainly not wrong to see the teaching of the Master of Nazareth based not just on the ‘written word’ but also on ‘tradition’, however: – has this tradition not been buried and twisted a long time ago, – even if the last remaining traces of its existence reach perhaps still occasionally into current times?

It is said that the master of the Gospels did not make or leave behind any written record of any description.

 Everyone is free to believe or disbelieve me when I say that there are people living on this planet who know with all certainty  transcending all other assurance that the Master of Nazareth did leave behind written records of his secret teachings: – that the last of these were still in existance at the time of the persecution of the Christians and were destroyed in Rome by loyal later disciples to prevent them getting into the hands of the ‘gentiles’, – just as in the ‘Gospel of St. John’ large sections of these texts written by his own hand are presented in extracts, in as far as they spoke in veiled language, and could be refashioned in the text as spoken words.

 Those who have this knowledge also know that the master’s texts written in his own hand were circulated in many copies, and that extracts from these were found in yet other writings apart from the Gospel which has come down to us bearing the name of ‘John’.

The knowledge of these few is therewith far from exhausted inasmuch as it relates to the Master of the Gospels; yet they too, like his earliest disciples, are bound by a law which has them keep secret the things which cannot be given to all. – They too speak to ‘the others’ only in ‘parables’ and through veiled symbols. –

 They are the guardians, renewed with every generation, of a sacred treasure which survives on  this planet because of them: – they are the true ‘knights of the Holy Grail’ of the legend, – they carry out a spiritual service of which only very few in every generation are capable for only very few are born to this service at any time.

 But one must be ‘born to it’, just as one must be born to be Mozart, another Beethoven; no one, even with all the effort in the world, could ‘become’ like them.

 Those men meant here – among whom only rarely have been found one with European blood through the millennia – are always the only ones possessing to a greater or lesser extent that secret ‘knowledge’ which the Master of the Gospels possessed and he possessed it only because he was one of them. But he also knew that there was ‘another’ to whom he owed all things just like his spiritual brothers; he himself confessed in reverence that that one was ‘greater’ than he who spoke of him. –

 He was able to prepare for those who followed him ‘habitations’ and he did prepare them. Indeed he still today lives himself in his spiritual form among those who are the sons of his ‘father’; for these men born in the eternal spirit also freely possess their powers after the occurrence called the death of the body, and are not, like ‘the others’, subject to the laws of the planet.

 They are the only true spiritual ‘masters’ on this earth, the Luminaries of the First Light, the living bearers of the eternal ‘Christos’-spirit, the transformers of eternal divine wisdom into what can be comprehended by earthly men…

 Those who find this incredible or see their pious church faith endangered may question it; however, they will be incapable of changing anything about the fact unknown to them.

 The thousands from every ‘Christian’ community of faith who have surpassed the zealousness of church based belief in the inner growth of their souls and who believe they feel the true presence of their master will not pay homage to any delusion!

Let one beware, as I have already said, of presuming that the Luminaries of the First Light, amongst whom the Master of Nazareth still lives today on earth in his spiritual form, can somehow be equated with the ‘masters’ spoken about in certain so-called ‘theosophical’ writings, or even with the aforementioned ‘Great School of Science’ created in America and bearing the stamp of fake, visible for all on its forehead, alongside all the pompous sounding moralistic declarations of its inventor who has been unmasked in the meantime!

 “For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” –

 “The children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” –

The ‘sons of the light’, the true representatives of ‘Theo-Sophia’ on this earth, are indeed ‘men of knowledge’, yet this knowledge is of a different kind to that knowledge belonging to any science.

 I must state in the face of all reasonable doubt, that this secret ‘knowledge’ exists for very few on this earth!

 It is knowledge founded on assurance through activity and comes to no one who does not bring from birth the ability to carry it out practically; for it is not knowledge ‘of’ something, not knowledge ‘about’ something, but it only exists in permanent action: – in a conscious living becoming at one with the object of knowledge itself.

 To paraphrase Patânjali, the wise man from India: “Just as water when poured into a vessel takes on  its form as it fills it, so too the spirit of the Yogi takes the form of the thing which he wants to penetrate knowingly!” (It is self-evident that he does not mean the ‘Yogis’ found on the street and in temple portals!)

 The condition of those capable of capturing this ‘knowledge’ can be described in the words: ‘knowing through self-transformation’.

Apart from this spiritual ‘knowing’ there is also a ‘teaching’ which cannot be ‘taught’ through words – which could never be written down in a book, because it is only accessible to self-experience; –

and that from the oldest days of the awakening of the animal man into the essence of man has been passed on through spiritual transmission by ‘masters’ who were ‘knowing through self-transformation’.

 Moreover, to receive this secret ‘teaching’ one must be innately suited, yet there are more people capable of receiving this sort of teaching than those born to know through self-transformation.

 There is an innermost secret realm of the spirit and spiritual forces in the spiritual region of our planet to which all who live on earth owe what is best about them!

 There is an eternal pre-existence before the human spirit enters this world of the visible and there is an eternal post-existence following the ‘death’ of the earthly body!

 There are spiritual ‘wonders’ which overshadow every oriental fairy-tale, and yet are realities!

 Yet what can be said in human words about all these things, and what has flowed through a sublime hierarchy of spiritual entities from the ‘First Light’ down to the ‘Luminaries’ on earth and through them into the channels of human language, is ineffably little compared to what ‘those who know through self-transformation’ owe to their experience, those who are permitted to say of themselves, as did the Master of the Gospels:

“All that the father has is mine!” –

“I and the father – are One!”

The communality of the few who ‘know through self-transformation’ is the manifestation of the eternal ‘Christos’ on this earth, and the Master of the Gospels is one of the highest sons of this spiritual communality of the Luminaries of the First Light who alone know the ‘father’ and can therefore do what the ‘father’ teaches them to do.

 The pious of his time called the spiritual master from Nazareth a ‘glutton and a wine bibber’ for they could not understand that a man who was ‘from God’ thus would live with ‘sinners’ without despising the gifts of this earth.

 They knew nothing of the fact that in him ‘the kingdom of heaven’ in which he spiritually lived, – had come into their presence, in the midst of this life on earth, and the recognition of Cephas-Peter was foreign to them: “Lord, to whom shall we go? – You have the words of life!” Yet the ‘Son of God’ of the Gospels never thought of regarding his human personality as the only bearer of this filial status on earth.

 Only his later exegetes misunderstood his words in this manner, twisting and distorting their meaning. –

 Countless are the errors derived from ignorance about the Christos-mystery; it would have been very easy to avoid many false teachings, had the saying been understood: “I am the door: if any man enter in through me he shall be blessed.” –

In this way the “the stone set as the cornerstone has been rejected by the builders” and men seek on false paths, for the path which is ‘truth’ and ‘life’ appears inaccessible to them.

In our own times it has seemed to the world to be a requirement of justice for women to be equal to men, and the warning of a genuine spiritual pupil of the Master, – a pupil who had received his knowledge through ‘spiritual transmission – that women should ‘keep silent’: – a woman should not teach the congregation since she cannot become knowing either through ‘spiritual transmission’ or ‘through self-transformation’,  has been mocked and ridiculed as an “outdated and unworthy view of the essence of the feminine.”

 With the complete weight of responsibility imposed by the burden of knowledge, however, all those who have gained ‘knowledge’ through ‘spiritual transmission’ or self-transformation are bound to confirm Paul’s words which, despite all reverence for women founded upon sacred awe for the ‘essence of the feminine’, even today hold true and can never lose validity in millennia to come!

 It is not for nothing that in India the linga and the phallus in ancient Hellas were elevated into the most sacred symbols, – even those who rose only a little above the esoteric knowledge of the ancient Asiatic cults to a higher understanding, recognised that one can only possess certain secret, elevated spiritual powers if one possesses as an earthlyman – in natura – what these symbols stand for. Hermaphroditism was always excluded, even from the most superficial ‘mysteries’, and the woman only ever had access to the earliest stages of general teaching, whereas the man alone could become an ‘initiate’, although women too were always willingly given what they could bear. (Degenerate mystic associations who already accepted women could only do this because the true mystery had been profaned by them and therefore removed from them long before!) All the most elevated mysteries in the most sublime sense of the word, – in whatever form they have appeared in the history of mankind to date, – are basically pure, spiritual sexual mysteries, and ‘kundalini’, the spiritually transformed power of propagation, is not for nothing sacred to the Indians as the most elevated of powers of the yogi, – though those aware of this transformation do not exist amongst the yogis the traveller meets.

 Every spiritual exertion of power requires corresponding physical organs in order to be manifested in any way in this earthly existence.

 A female spiritual ‘master’ is a contradiction in itself because a woman cannot provide the spiritual and physical prerequisite conditional on bringing about practically the ‘capability of knowing’ of a spiritual master, – for this demands the clearly defined and intact male sexual nature! –

 Woman can be born as a somnambulist, as a clairvoyant, but never can she be made into an ‘initiate’.

  Without exception the woman only achieves her spiritually highest level in conditions existing after earthly life through her fusion: her becoming one with a male-polar human spirit transfigured in divinity, which carries her within itself in mysterious union – as though secured within a tabernacle enveloped in love, – through the endlessness of the spiritual spheres.

 Observe the many different male types found in the Gospels, beginning with the Master and extending to the least significant among his disciples; compare with all these men and their powerful word, – once they had matured, – the female figures depicted in the Gospels, and you will see in which position only the woman can find her place, if the Christos-mystery of the man is to touch her existence effectively.

The two poles of the sexes are eternal in nature and reach up into the innermost of the First Light.

 Never was a woman, as popular spurious wisdom has it, a man ‘in an earlier incarnation’; never could she become a man ‘in a later incarnation’.

 Whatever today on earth is ‘man’ was always, even before eternities, male-polar in its original spiritual nature; whatever today on earth lives as ‘woman’ was eternally female-spiritual in nature from the female being in the Godhead which is ‘man’ and ‘woman’!

 The absurd supposition that the polarity of the sexes is only founded within the physical and could change betrays absolute ignorance about the primary laws of the spirit where all polar sexuality, including that which has effect in the whole non-human physical world, is given from eternity.

 That many women would ‘rather be men’ is rooted in their female spiritual nature.

 If they had ever ‘been’ men, this desire would be foreign to them.

 Moreover, whatever normally only ‘reincarnates’ is merely the unsaturated lower powers of the soul which keep appearing within the complex of the soul of new people until the impulse which fashioned them in earlier people is finally exhausted.

 They can naturally be transferred from men to woman and from woman to men, but without changing the defined sexuality of their bearers at that time.

 Every person is, however, a completely unique emanation of the eternal spirit  ‘charged’ with the will to individualisation of male- or female-polar tension, – although there also lives within the man a female element and within the woman a male element. – A person who has completed his life’s path here on earth under normal circumstances never returns as a later person to the earth.

 Abnormal cases where ‘reincarnation’ may in fact occur in the crude sense of esoteric teaching: – suicide, the death of young children or death on a completely bestialised spiritual level – are hardly significant for the rule and must in any case be ignored here, as here also a change can never occur in the sexual polarity given from eternity.

 What people today like to call ‘theosophy’ has, of course, something else to say on these matters, and the credulous advocates of modern ‘arcane teachings’ will see in my words an attack on their dearest dogma.

 Yet – – who – has given the world these ‘arcane teachings’ in such abundance??

 Do not all these teachings, does not all this supposed ‘unveiling’ of arcane wisdom which has kept so many minds spell-bound for practically half a century (* This book was first published in 1936.), come from a woman?

 To a certain extent, it must be said, it was a ‘brilliant’ woman who was able to comprehend much genuine wisdom which came to her through her somnambulist disposition. Yet she was also unfortunately compelled to allow herself and her soul to be abused in the most egregious manner by male masters of powers she, as a woman, could simply not withstand. In the end she had to be led astray by authoritative action because otherwise, without suspecting the implications of her actions, she would have become a ‘danger to the world’.

 She was regrettably a woman whose ambition sought here to impart what only one of those who are knowing ‘through self-transformation’ could have imparted; however, one of those would never have imparted these things in the form she wished for.

Now it is said: “She was just a tool in the hands of the ‘masters’ she served devotedly!”

 No doubt! – This is unfortunately very true, and so the talent she had to offer in a mixture of arrogance and blind trust became – a fearsome gift!

 In her writings fragments of true eternal wisdom can be found like arabesques mingled with superstitions derived from every century and region on earth.

 In her writings are found suggestions of sublime insight shrouded in a fog of pseudo-‘knowledge’ emanating from the crypts of gloomy human error, regarded by those who imparted it to her as ‘sacred’ because it only came about by surrendering what is the most sacred  possession of the human spirit.

 In her writings are found traces of ancient spiritual paths overgrown with – parodied – attempts to explain given to her simply to make a fool out of her.

 The sources of her inspiration are extremely varied in value and this conforms to everything she imparts.

The unfortunate woman had, – as though she were a kind of living ‘radio station’, – to accept everything reaching her from all over the world and beyond, on account of her abnormal disposition as a somnambulist and medium.

 She was, being a woman incapable of ever carrying out the counter-checks required, she lacked every possibility of safely testing the sources.

 Trustingly she believed in the ‘overpowering wisdom’ communicated to her, among others
by a party which even today takes an extraordinary pleasure in parodying the ‘knowledge of westerners’, – which even today deploys every occult art for this purpose in ‘spiritualist séances’ and wherever else Europeans with a spiritualist disposition can be ensnared. Naturally, for those who do not know this sphere of human activity from extra-sensory experience, this can seem quite amazing and incredible, though as regards the spirit they have perhaps already become victims of this sort of men without suspecting it.

 In complete passivity she succumbed to the influences of another arcane sect, spread throughout the whole of Asia and rooted most deeply in particular parts of Tibet, whose religious duty it is to deploy all the abundant occult means it has at its disposal to harm and, if possible, destroy Europeans.

 Alongside were the influences of noble zealots who sought to rescue her from those fetters; but they themselves had only tinsel to give instead of gold. Moreover, they behaved questionably towards her by allowing her, as the object of their influence, to continue to believe that certain other manifestations of a physical type, which made a great impression on her, also emanated from them, and used these manifestations unscrupulously for their own purposes.

The tormented woman was all too inclined to connect, in her uncritical vanity, all manifestations with the highest and noblest source imaginable whose existence she had sensed through somnambulism, – but with which she had never come into contact.

A real witches’ Sabbath of the most diverse occult influences was often concentrated upon the suggestible mind of this pitiful woman; if Mr. Hodgson had suspected anything of the true events surrounding her, the ‘Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research’ would have been richer by several issues and of almost unprecedented interest in the whole world. But as it was, he was only able to unearth her external attempts at deception. (See aforementioned reports!)

 Now I have already said that there was also a necessity coming from a higher authority to confuse indirectly all communications made to that woman relating to certain things whose confidentiality is the strictest responsibility of all those who know about it, if they are to avoid the most dreadful occult-spiritual forces of explosion and disintegration being added to the dreadful abundance of destructive inventions western ‘cultural’ mankind has at its disposal. –

 (Just as fire and electricity function as beneficial servants of man but can also destroy everything man values, so too those powers, when in the hands of those responsible and appointed can bring benefit to mankind, whereas they become destructive powers in the hands of all others, even if used involuntarily.)

 One will understand that nothing else could result from all these influences and counter-influences than a jungle forest pervaded with the most amazing creepers spread far and wide in the writings and reports on the life of the strange woman.

Garlands have now been made from the rarest orchids and intoxicatingly perfumed jungle flowers in this tropical forest and since the earthly days of this clairvoyant, unfortunate somnambulist, one has thought it necessary to lay them in awe on the altars of the temple of the ‘masters’…

 Everything which has since usurped the name ‘theosophy’ is being constructed upon the teachings of, what seems to the outer eye to be, such an eccentric and mysterious woman.

Men who have felt drawn to this woman, to her writings or accounts of her life, through their own somnambulist disposition, have been subjected to the same influences as she has; they ‘confirm’ – to use their own term – ‘research in the field of spiritual science’ –  what their prophetess, shining forth from the blazes of the underworld, had preached.

 Women of a highly sensitive disposition and filled with the purest enthusiasm have so accustomed themselves to the conceptual world of their famous predecessor that they soon learnt to ‘see’ in the way Mrs. Helena Petrowna Blavatskij wanted them to see; every suggestion of doubt in any of the claims supported by her authority appeared to them to be a crime against all spiritual truth.

 In this way the soil was eventually prepared where the most varied types of spiritual parasites could flourish and prosper; their centres of inflammation were able to spread out further and further, for it was only so easy to support every example of such abstruse teaching, either through statements found in the writings of the ‘servant of the masters’ or to pass it off as the most recent results of ‘research in the field of spiritual science’.

In particular the last method was always effective, for ‘research in the field of spiritual science’ – evoked such a sense of trustworthiness in westerners used to the exact research methods of the natural sciences that they were quite happy to have displayed before

them ‘research results’ by especially adept conceptual acrobats, which – at best  – only came about through the self-hypnosis of the ‘spirit researchers’ and offered cause for a catastrophic collective hypnosis promoted by all sorts of auxiliary means…

 All who are even slightly acquainted with the history of the Anglo-Indian ‘theosophical’ movement and its influences will not find it hard to find examples relating to my words.

 That this movement was able to spread also in India does not speak positively of the powers
of judgement of modern, half-Europeanised Indians.

On the other hand, the powers of judgement of many Europeans cannot be rated any higher; those Europeans who chase after every fantasist, indeed after every world-travelling Asiatic charlatan with any business acumen, just because the alleged ‘seer’, ‘master’, ‘yogi’, or whatever they call themselves, wears an exotic caftan or similar garb, and has the darkest possible complexion. –

 Whoever is capable of reading the writings of the founders of this movement not only with credulous amazement and reverential embarrassment, – whoever dares to check these writings with a critical eye, and whoever undertakes to view just as critically the accounts of the life of the authoress, will very quickly be capable of confirming himself all I have said about the sources of her inspiration. He will also quickly discover that the attempt, which caused a furore in its time, to depict the unfortunate woman as the victim of European occultists is based on the complete inability to get to the bottom of things as they really were.

I do not think that I need to account for the source of my knowledge in this matter with those who are even partially capable of making a judgement.

 After everything I have presented thus far, one may refuse to believe me if, after testing those things which can be easily tested, one still finds the dubious courage to do so. Yet it will not have escaped even those who for their own purposes would rather that these words had never been written, that I speak with full awareness of my responsibility and from an absolute assurance of knowledge.

 I too would rather not have written them and have kept my knowledge to myself, had I not been obliged to do so.

 I speak in complete agreement with those whom Mrs. Blavatskij indeed suspected in her somnambulistic way, with those she believed she was in contact, with those she had, however, never been in any contact in any ‘occult’ way or even merely in the most external way.

 Our knowledge of things is not based on some external observations but results from a form of perception before which there can be no veils and coverings, however thick they may seem to be pulled before our outer eyes.

 In the name of those ‘knowing  through self-transformation’ and whose silent, hidden spiritual community has outlasted many millennia, I declare that Mrs. Helena Petrowna Blavatskij erred in thinking that she ever came into contact with any one of us in a direct occult or external way, and that she had no idea who in reality her inspirers were, the inspirers of those teachings to which she felt disposed to give the name ‘theosophy’ through the arbitrary naming of the society she founded, which before this renaming had had a very different name, calling itself openly: ‘spiritist’.

The teachings she makes known are a mixtum compositum of the most diverse ideas from all periods and peoples, enlarged by additions of the publisher herself and her English and other western associates helping her externally; and thus have so little in common with true ‘theosophy’, in the way the word has been understood for many centuries since it was spread by the Apostle Paul, that it constitutes a falsification of the concept to describe it by this name.

 True ‘theosophy’ may indeed be dressed in the most diverse religious clothing; yet never can a cloak sewn together from scraps of priestly garbs of every religion bestow ‘theo-sophia’ – knowledge of God or awareness of God – upon its wearer.

 One may name as well Lao-Tse, the great Indian and Tibetan religious teachers, the Apostle Paul and the author of the Gospel of John as teachers of true ‘theosophy’, as the genuine ancient Muslim ‘Sufi’ in ancient Persia, imbued with wisdom, or the ‘last Indian prophet’ Ramakrishna, – the mystic philosophers Tauler and Meister Eckhard, or the still far from understood Jakob Böhme, at home in his spiritual patrimony. But it is not acceptable to declare the dregs of occult obsession as found in the ‘arcane teachings’ of Mrs. Blavatskij to be ‘theosophy’.

 The real merit of this eccentric woman consists in her having given the western world an indication of the existence of a source of wisdom to be found in the ‘innermost east’. Like Moses she only saw the promised land in a vision, however, its waters never moistened her lips passionately demanding attention.

In my writings I have again and again been concerned to show how one can really come close to this pure source which flows ‘from high mountains’.

 He who wants to reach this source must seek within his own inner being and ascend here the ‘path to the heights’.

 Let him stay with that familiar form of faith he has known from his youth and translate what I impart in my writings into the anciently founded concepts of this faith, considering well that primarily I am writing for those who have found no satisfaction in the dominant faiths and yet are seeking to reach their living God.

Let those who think they need further instruction, and who can also read between the lines, scrutinise soberly the writings of the aforementioned mystic philosophers, to whom can be added Angelus Silesius and Thomas à Kempis with complete justification.

 Let them select what speaks to their souls, wherever it may be found; but let them avoid the error that the ‘knowledge of the soul’: – that real ‘theosophy’ of all peoples and times! – is ‘knowledge’ in the sense of ‘science’. As though this ‘knowledge of the eternal soul’ needs any promotion by some association or could ever be attained through the study of dense volumes. – It would mean
a life’s work for anyone to set himself the task of acquainting himself with every written witness available in the world given by those who truly live in the spirit, and a life spent in this way would, moreover, lead far away from the path of the soul to the light. All those who have dedicated their lives to such searching have ultimately left this earth while still in the deepest misery of the soul.

 “He who seeks will find, and he who knocks, it will be opened unto him,”: – but only constant perseverance when seeking and knocking within one’s own inner being leads to the goal which the Master of the Gospels showed to his chosen ones when he said:

 “Whoever believes in me, believes not in me but in him who sent me!”

 “For I have not spoken of myself, but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life eternal: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak!”

 In these words he speaks on behalf of everyone who knows the ‘father’, whether revealed to him during his earthly life in India, China, Tibet, or in modern Europe. The words of the one who teaches as the ‘father’ commands him to teach, lead to true ‘theo-sophia’ which is identical to the originally imparted mysterious and spiritual ‘Christianity’ from the eternal ‘Christos’ in the First Light whose most sublime temple on earth was found only in the ‘innermost east’ long before

the Master of Nazareth, as one belonging to it, taught how to experience eternal love. Here it will remain in existence until the end of the days on this earth, and with it for all time those eternally ordained to it and who belong to it  as ‘priests after the order of Melchisedec’: – the ‘order’ which  the eternal sets up for itself within the temporal!

  Only for these exceptionally few men of this earth, whose eternal spiritual essence received the form of consciousness for it from the ‘Sophia’: – the wisdom! – of God as the eternal feminine pole of the substantial spirit, is it ever possible according to this order, to communicate the recognition and the knowledge about the Sophia in God to their fellow men on earth!